From NewHaven Software Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| (One intermediate revision not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | Payment Processing Inc.
| |
| | | | |
| - | Competitor of MPS that we are considering for payment processing/gateway.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Pros
| |
| - | *Member of the PCI council
| |
| - | *Develop and support their own gateway (24/7 support)
| |
| - | *Will pay for our PA DSS and visa listing if we adopt their tokenization solution
| |
| - | *Experienced staff of compliance guys who work closely with QSA's and they can get us the answers we need
| |
| - | *Work with us to pre-assess
| |
| - | *Reduced recert ~3K (every 3 yrs)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Cons or challenges
| |
| - | *If we adopt tokenization, we must convert all users onto it - PPI would be our only provider
| |
| - | **Can run a batch process to get tokens for existing cards when we first convert
| |
| - | *Not compatible with other gateways
| |
| - | *uses order number as unique identifier (must be integer, no alpha or dashes)
| |
| - | **allows us to poll their system for the status of a charge (if we lost connection)
| |
| - | **They can provide an order number (like a transid) since there are too many obstacles to us using order number (cv3, multiple invoices per order, multiple credit cards for an order, alpha)
| |
Current revision as of 23:53, 28 October 2009
